<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flash!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bloglily.com/2009/03/20/flash/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bloglily.com/2009/03/20/flash/</link>
	<description>"it must give pleasure" -- Wallace Stevens</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 01:38:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: summer picnic</title>
		<link>http://bloglily.com/2009/03/20/flash/#comment-23432</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[summer picnic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 02:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloglily.com/?p=1159#comment-23432</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Right on! I felt the same way as a reader. As a writer though, I LOVE flash fiction. Maybe it&#039;s because I just can&#039;t stick it out to get a novel written, but a 500-word piece is so satisfying to write and polish. Check out Brevity &amp; Echo, an anthology by creative writing grad students at Emerson College for a nice selection of quick but meaty reads.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right on! I felt the same way as a reader. As a writer though, I LOVE flash fiction. Maybe it&#8217;s because I just can&#8217;t stick it out to get a novel written, but a 500-word piece is so satisfying to write and polish. Check out Brevity &amp; Echo, an anthology by creative writing grad students at Emerson College for a nice selection of quick but meaty reads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Showing and Telling Redux &#171; Signals to Attend</title>
		<link>http://bloglily.com/2009/03/20/flash/#comment-23134</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Showing and Telling Redux &#171; Signals to Attend]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 18:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloglily.com/?p=1159#comment-23134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Bloglily this week, I encountered her questions about flash fiction, stories that use 500 words or less, and [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bloglily this week, I encountered her questions about flash fiction, stories that use 500 words or less, and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ella C</title>
		<link>http://bloglily.com/2009/03/20/flash/#comment-23122</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ella C]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 01:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloglily.com/?p=1159#comment-23122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know what you mean about Twitter - I have yet to join, too, and have trouble enough coming up with my facebook status.  But I have a writer friend who absolutely loves texting.  She loves how whether you spell something out - just imagine the difference between getting the text &quot;I love you&quot; and &quot;i luv u&quot; - can change the meaning, but even better, the punctuation.  Do you put periods at the end of your texts?  They always seem so much more serious and final than without.  And I think she takes pleasure in finding a way to clearly express an idea, a thought, or a feeling, in so few words.  I think text and twitter and facebook can be good practice in writing succinctly for those of us who tend to write more.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know what you mean about Twitter &#8211; I have yet to join, too, and have trouble enough coming up with my facebook status.  But I have a writer friend who absolutely loves texting.  She loves how whether you spell something out &#8211; just imagine the difference between getting the text &#8220;I love you&#8221; and &#8220;i luv u&#8221; &#8211; can change the meaning, but even better, the punctuation.  Do you put periods at the end of your texts?  They always seem so much more serious and final than without.  And I think she takes pleasure in finding a way to clearly express an idea, a thought, or a feeling, in so few words.  I think text and twitter and facebook can be good practice in writing succinctly for those of us who tend to write more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bloglily</title>
		<link>http://bloglily.com/2009/03/20/flash/#comment-23117</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bloglily]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 17:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloglily.com/?p=1159#comment-23117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh, I don&#039;t think you&#039;re late to anything, Mr. Marshall -- this is a Slow Blog.  We could talk about flash fiction for a very long time.  I like your idea of the story that lives between the words.  And yes, you&#039;re right, the trick as a writer is to figure out how to use the form properly.  

Tai, Flash memoir!  That&#039;s a terrific suggestion.  Thank you very much.  Your blog, by the way, does a huge amount in a few words -- and a picture.  It&#039;s a model for short form blogging.  I love visiting it.  Some days it&#039;s the perfect antitode to too much time spent writing about the law.  

U-Dad -- The six word memoir is a lot of fun.  For my friend C&#039;s birthday a few years ago, everyone wrote six word stories of how they met her.  That Hemingway six word story -- For sale: baby shoes never used -- sets the standard.  

Jacob, Nope.  You haven&#039;t overstayed anything.  How could you?  That&#039;s a wonderful description of your microfiction project and the possibilities of this form.  Thank you for that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I don&#8217;t think you&#8217;re late to anything, Mr. Marshall &#8212; this is a Slow Blog.  We could talk about flash fiction for a very long time.  I like your idea of the story that lives between the words.  And yes, you&#8217;re right, the trick as a writer is to figure out how to use the form properly.  </p>
<p>Tai, Flash memoir!  That&#8217;s a terrific suggestion.  Thank you very much.  Your blog, by the way, does a huge amount in a few words &#8212; and a picture.  It&#8217;s a model for short form blogging.  I love visiting it.  Some days it&#8217;s the perfect antitode to too much time spent writing about the law.  </p>
<p>U-Dad &#8212; The six word memoir is a lot of fun.  For my friend C&#8217;s birthday a few years ago, everyone wrote six word stories of how they met her.  That Hemingway six word story &#8212; For sale: baby shoes never used &#8212; sets the standard.  </p>
<p>Jacob, Nope.  You haven&#8217;t overstayed anything.  How could you?  That&#8217;s a wonderful description of your microfiction project and the possibilities of this form.  Thank you for that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dmarshall58</title>
		<link>http://bloglily.com/2009/03/20/flash/#comment-23116</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dmarshall58]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 10:32:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloglily.com/?p=1159#comment-23116</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m late coming to this string of comments, but as a haiku writer, I&#039;ve come to believe most of the story is between the words, not in them. As your discussion of sonnets suggests, the choices writers make create distinct and different challenges. Anyone who can accept 50 words, 500 words, or 500 pages and find what&#039;s perfect to that form has my respect.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m late coming to this string of comments, but as a haiku writer, I&#8217;ve come to believe most of the story is between the words, not in them. As your discussion of sonnets suggests, the choices writers make create distinct and different challenges. Anyone who can accept 50 words, 500 words, or 500 pages and find what&#8217;s perfect to that form has my respect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tai</title>
		<link>http://bloglily.com/2009/03/20/flash/#comment-23112</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tai]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 17:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloglily.com/?p=1159#comment-23112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Try to find the book, &quot;I Remember,&quot; by Joe Brainard. A masterpiece, recommended to me by another blogger. I suppose you might call it &quot;flash memoir.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try to find the book, &#8220;I Remember,&#8221; by Joe Brainard. A masterpiece, recommended to me by another blogger. I suppose you might call it &#8220;flash memoir.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: (un)relaxeddad</title>
		<link>http://bloglily.com/2009/03/20/flash/#comment-23111</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[(un)relaxeddad]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 07:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloglily.com/?p=1159#comment-23111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And then we have nano-fiction, e.g. http://www.smithmag.net/sixwords/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And then we have nano-fiction, e.g. <a href="http://www.smithmag.net/sixwords/" rel="nofollow">http://www.smithmag.net/sixwords/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob Russell</title>
		<link>http://bloglily.com/2009/03/20/flash/#comment-23109</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jacob Russell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 01:41:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloglily.com/?p=1159#comment-23109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hope I&#039;m not being the guest who overstayed his welcome here. But this is something I&#039;ve been thinking about. In writing transport (the piece I linked several comments back), I wanted to counter the expectation that condensation need be fast paced, breathlessly rush to denouement and resolution. Is it possible, I wondered, to write as though there were all the time in the world--to spread out layer after layer, as one might do in beginning a novel, and yet, set a limit of 500 words?

Emily Dickinson (our unsurpassed master of condensation) uses the word &#039;transport&#039; that way--to layer the meaning of her subject each time she uses the word. Transport for Dickinson is everything from movement in space, in time, memory--to the idea of an altered state, a spiritual transport into another dimension. I took three journal entries, written while riding the Frankford El in Philly one summer, to see if I could use this idea--transit--disassociation--transport: three pieces that I set myself the task of writing in a leisurely paced descriptive style,  but which might suggest thematic layers, each coming quickly to an end... like a change in a stream of associations, but just as quickly taking up the same idea again in a different setting.  The idea being... that this might go on and on... not in the addition of new fictions, but in the reader carrying that mode of perception into the world... which is one of the things that gives us pleasure in long novels... that while we are engaged in them, we go about our lives as though it were somehow a continuum of that fictive universe. 

Micro fiction seems so perfectly suited for internet reading... something one might take a few minutes to read in the morning before going off into the work-a-day world... and have it cling to you, shaping perceptions the way dreams sometimes do.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope I&#8217;m not being the guest who overstayed his welcome here. But this is something I&#8217;ve been thinking about. In writing transport (the piece I linked several comments back), I wanted to counter the expectation that condensation need be fast paced, breathlessly rush to denouement and resolution. Is it possible, I wondered, to write as though there were all the time in the world&#8211;to spread out layer after layer, as one might do in beginning a novel, and yet, set a limit of 500 words?</p>
<p>Emily Dickinson (our unsurpassed master of condensation) uses the word &#8216;transport&#8217; that way&#8211;to layer the meaning of her subject each time she uses the word. Transport for Dickinson is everything from movement in space, in time, memory&#8211;to the idea of an altered state, a spiritual transport into another dimension. I took three journal entries, written while riding the Frankford El in Philly one summer, to see if I could use this idea&#8211;transit&#8211;disassociation&#8211;transport: three pieces that I set myself the task of writing in a leisurely paced descriptive style,  but which might suggest thematic layers, each coming quickly to an end&#8230; like a change in a stream of associations, but just as quickly taking up the same idea again in a different setting.  The idea being&#8230; that this might go on and on&#8230; not in the addition of new fictions, but in the reader carrying that mode of perception into the world&#8230; which is one of the things that gives us pleasure in long novels&#8230; that while we are engaged in them, we go about our lives as though it were somehow a continuum of that fictive universe. </p>
<p>Micro fiction seems so perfectly suited for internet reading&#8230; something one might take a few minutes to read in the morning before going off into the work-a-day world&#8230; and have it cling to you, shaping perceptions the way dreams sometimes do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bloglily</title>
		<link>http://bloglily.com/2009/03/20/flash/#comment-23108</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bloglily]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 00:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloglily.com/?p=1159#comment-23108</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jacob!  Dude!  (As we say in our house when someone does some particularly audacious thing, like catapult off the top of the car while eating a piece of toast) -- that was a 99 WORD PIECE OF FLASH FICTION!  As you well know.  And so you win the He-Goes-For-It-In-The-Comments-Section Award which is, naturally, a lovely sprig of star jasmine from our blooming yard.  

Plus, we are all saying in unison, &lt;em&gt;You rock, Jacob.&lt;/em&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jacob!  Dude!  (As we say in our house when someone does some particularly audacious thing, like catapult off the top of the car while eating a piece of toast) &#8212; that was a 99 WORD PIECE OF FLASH FICTION!  As you well know.  And so you win the He-Goes-For-It-In-The-Comments-Section Award which is, naturally, a lovely sprig of star jasmine from our blooming yard.  </p>
<p>Plus, we are all saying in unison, <em>You rock, Jacob.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob Russell</title>
		<link>http://bloglily.com/2009/03/20/flash/#comment-23107</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jacob Russell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 00:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloglily.com/?p=1159#comment-23107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have to take that back... if I think of the reality, what a flower is in its own right, and not as &quot;a pretty thing.&quot;

A flower is the structure of a plant&#039;s  reproductive organs, its genatilia, botanical equivalents of uterus, ovary, penus, testicle--evolved to seduce insects and trick them into bringing about their reproductive union. Now a poem that emulates all of that: conjucating verbs, the sytactical rapure of noun clusters, propositional phrases seducing immoral apositives... there might be something to poetry as &#039;flower&#039;... ah, but what do we do with flowers? We spread them around caskets to mask the stench of death... and alas, those are the flowers that come to mind when I hear &quot;flower&quot; and &quot;poetry&quot; in the same breath.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to take that back&#8230; if I think of the reality, what a flower is in its own right, and not as &#8220;a pretty thing.&#8221;</p>
<p>A flower is the structure of a plant&#8217;s  reproductive organs, its genatilia, botanical equivalents of uterus, ovary, penus, testicle&#8211;evolved to seduce insects and trick them into bringing about their reproductive union. Now a poem that emulates all of that: conjucating verbs, the sytactical rapure of noun clusters, propositional phrases seducing immoral apositives&#8230; there might be something to poetry as &#8216;flower&#8217;&#8230; ah, but what do we do with flowers? We spread them around caskets to mask the stench of death&#8230; and alas, those are the flowers that come to mind when I hear &#8220;flower&#8221; and &#8220;poetry&#8221; in the same breath.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bloglily</title>
		<link>http://bloglily.com/2009/03/20/flash/#comment-23106</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bloglily]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 00:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloglily.com/?p=1159#comment-23106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Jacob,  You say just what I was trying to say which is that a &quot;piece of 500 words or so has to be more than a miniature, needs to discover in itself the possibilities of its form.&quot;  Now, it&#039;s fine to not LIKE that form because you want something other than what is possibile in that form, which I think is Caryn&#039;s point.  The form itself, though, is not the problem.  I have been loving, and not so-loving, Lydia Davis this week, and I am looking forward to posting about her and this form.  As for flowers and gardens and dandelions, I am always happy when people go for it in the comments language-wise.  Far better than its tepid opposite!  (Which neither you nor Caryn could ever be accused of producing.)  As for the 1053 page poem, good heavens!  I want to know more about that.  

Dear Caryn, I have long thought of short stories as existing on a continuum in which poetry is at one end and Russian novels are at the other -- I think short stories are closer to poetry than to Russian novels (or at least I tentatively think that, because I&#039;m not quite sure today) -- and I agree with you that even shorter short stories would appear to be even closer to poetry.  But my thoughts about this are in flux, partly because I haven&#039;t yet read enough short-shorts to know what I think.  That&#039;s the subject for my NEXT blog post, and I&#039;m looking forward to hearing what you think.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Jacob,  You say just what I was trying to say which is that a &#8220;piece of 500 words or so has to be more than a miniature, needs to discover in itself the possibilities of its form.&#8221;  Now, it&#8217;s fine to not LIKE that form because you want something other than what is possibile in that form, which I think is Caryn&#8217;s point.  The form itself, though, is not the problem.  I have been loving, and not so-loving, Lydia Davis this week, and I am looking forward to posting about her and this form.  As for flowers and gardens and dandelions, I am always happy when people go for it in the comments language-wise.  Far better than its tepid opposite!  (Which neither you nor Caryn could ever be accused of producing.)  As for the 1053 page poem, good heavens!  I want to know more about that.  </p>
<p>Dear Caryn, I have long thought of short stories as existing on a continuum in which poetry is at one end and Russian novels are at the other &#8212; I think short stories are closer to poetry than to Russian novels (or at least I tentatively think that, because I&#8217;m not quite sure today) &#8212; and I agree with you that even shorter short stories would appear to be even closer to poetry.  But my thoughts about this are in flux, partly because I haven&#8217;t yet read enough short-shorts to know what I think.  That&#8217;s the subject for my NEXT blog post, and I&#8217;m looking forward to hearing what you think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob Russell</title>
		<link>http://bloglily.com/2009/03/20/flash/#comment-23105</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jacob Russell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 23:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloglily.com/?p=1159#comment-23105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Caryn,

&quot;Poetry is a flower.&quot;

 I have sitting on my desk Ron Siliman&#039;s The Alphabet: a 1053 page poem... or perhaps, 24 linked poems? 

Some flower! 

I know you didn&#039;t intend that, but I can&#039;t think of a single poet I know who wouldn&#039;t find it somewhat insulting (or at least, slightly rediculous) to liken poetry to a flower.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Caryn,</p>
<p>&#8220;Poetry is a flower.&#8221;</p>
<p> I have sitting on my desk Ron Siliman&#8217;s The Alphabet: a 1053 page poem&#8230; or perhaps, 24 linked poems? </p>
<p>Some flower! </p>
<p>I know you didn&#8217;t intend that, but I can&#8217;t think of a single poet I know who wouldn&#8217;t find it somewhat insulting (or at least, slightly rediculous) to liken poetry to a flower.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob Russell</title>
		<link>http://bloglily.com/2009/03/20/flash/#comment-23104</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jacob Russell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 23:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloglily.com/?p=1159#comment-23104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think you seriously understate the power of condensation in the hands of a competent writer. A piece of 500 words or so has to be more than a miniture, needs to discover in itself the possibilites of its form. While little of what I&#039;ve seen of micro-fiction succeeds on any level, the challenge intrigues me and I can&#039;t come up with any aesthetic argument for why it can&#039;t be done. 

As for micro-fiction as poetry... what on earth does that mean? If a novel doesn&#039;t approach poetry on some level I don&#039;t find it worth reading--and I don&#039;t mean by that, flowery overly ornate figurative prose; I mean, where language is employed as more than a means to an end, as is the case with most commeercial fiction.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you seriously understate the power of condensation in the hands of a competent writer. A piece of 500 words or so has to be more than a miniture, needs to discover in itself the possibilites of its form. While little of what I&#8217;ve seen of micro-fiction succeeds on any level, the challenge intrigues me and I can&#8217;t come up with any aesthetic argument for why it can&#8217;t be done. </p>
<p>As for micro-fiction as poetry&#8230; what on earth does that mean? If a novel doesn&#8217;t approach poetry on some level I don&#8217;t find it worth reading&#8211;and I don&#8217;t mean by that, flowery overly ornate figurative prose; I mean, where language is employed as more than a means to an end, as is the case with most commeercial fiction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caryn Caldwell</title>
		<link>http://bloglily.com/2009/03/20/flash/#comment-23103</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Caryn Caldwell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 23:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloglily.com/?p=1159#comment-23103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You expressed my thoughts about flash fiction EXACTLY! I read fiction because I want to be swept away into another world, to be caught up in the characters and the setting and the plot and, if it&#039;s different, the time period. Five hundred words, as you said, is merely an introduction to all of that. And, yes, poetry is different, because the best poetry captures and essence -- a moment or a thought or an idea. NOT an entire plot. Poetry is a flower. A book is a garden. And flash fiction? I don&#039;t know -- a dandelion?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You expressed my thoughts about flash fiction EXACTLY! I read fiction because I want to be swept away into another world, to be caught up in the characters and the setting and the plot and, if it&#8217;s different, the time period. Five hundred words, as you said, is merely an introduction to all of that. And, yes, poetry is different, because the best poetry captures and essence &#8212; a moment or a thought or an idea. NOT an entire plot. Poetry is a flower. A book is a garden. And flash fiction? I don&#8217;t know &#8212; a dandelion?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bloglily</title>
		<link>http://bloglily.com/2009/03/20/flash/#comment-23102</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bloglily]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 00:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloglily.com/?p=1159#comment-23102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh dear Gentle Reader, I think twitter looks like it might be fun -- but I&#039;m sooo long-winded.  I don&#039;t think I could survive it.  

Genie,  Thanks for the link and for the recommendations.  I just got a Lydia Davis book in the mail today and I&#039;ve requested two others.  I can&#039;t wait to sit down and read her.  (Plus, I have vol. 1 of Remembrance of Things Past!)  I loved our Indian lunch - I&#039;ve wanted to go to Vik&#039;s Chaat House for a really long time and I&#039;m so glad I finally got to do it.  

That&#039;s so interesting Courtney, that your work has you on twitter.  Is it a way to make sure you&#039;re working???  Hmm.  

Dear David,  That looks like a lot of fun.  I think I might even try it myself.  After I read Lydia Davis, and you!  

Mari,  I think that&#039;s the same conclusion I&#039;ve come to.  It simply can&#039;t be the case that you can conclude, simply because something&#039;s written in a short form, that it won&#039;t be interesting.  I&#039;m looking forward to becoming interested!

Jacob!  I can&#039;t wait to go &amp; see that.  And to look at the Joyce.  Thank you.

Pauline, Haibun sound like the perfect lunch reading material.  In fact, they sound a little like food, don&#039;t you think?

OP -- Yes, isn&#039;t it funny how if people are stealing your book it&#039;s a sign that you totally rock as a writer?  As for racing you -- I&#039;m going to have to slink along in your dust and hope you leave me something when you&#039;re finished!

Dear Dorothy, I&#039;m looking forward to writing about Lydia Davis -- I started reading her at lunch today (while I was eating something other than a haibun, but that is my fault, entirely).  And what I especially love is that she is funny.

Dearest litlove, I know this isn&#039;t really a response to your comment, but I love that word &quot;risible&quot;  -- I&#039;m going to see if I can work it into something, although maybe not a law something, because we&#039;re not supposed to have a sense of humor there.  Still....  As for twitter, well, every time I go over there to sign up I stop  myself -- I&#039;m still incorporating facebook into my life.  I think twitter will send me over the edge.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh dear Gentle Reader, I think twitter looks like it might be fun &#8212; but I&#8217;m sooo long-winded.  I don&#8217;t think I could survive it.  </p>
<p>Genie,  Thanks for the link and for the recommendations.  I just got a Lydia Davis book in the mail today and I&#8217;ve requested two others.  I can&#8217;t wait to sit down and read her.  (Plus, I have vol. 1 of Remembrance of Things Past!)  I loved our Indian lunch &#8211; I&#8217;ve wanted to go to Vik&#8217;s Chaat House for a really long time and I&#8217;m so glad I finally got to do it.  </p>
<p>That&#8217;s so interesting Courtney, that your work has you on twitter.  Is it a way to make sure you&#8217;re working???  Hmm.  </p>
<p>Dear David,  That looks like a lot of fun.  I think I might even try it myself.  After I read Lydia Davis, and you!  </p>
<p>Mari,  I think that&#8217;s the same conclusion I&#8217;ve come to.  It simply can&#8217;t be the case that you can conclude, simply because something&#8217;s written in a short form, that it won&#8217;t be interesting.  I&#8217;m looking forward to becoming interested!</p>
<p>Jacob!  I can&#8217;t wait to go &amp; see that.  And to look at the Joyce.  Thank you.</p>
<p>Pauline, Haibun sound like the perfect lunch reading material.  In fact, they sound a little like food, don&#8217;t you think?</p>
<p>OP &#8212; Yes, isn&#8217;t it funny how if people are stealing your book it&#8217;s a sign that you totally rock as a writer?  As for racing you &#8212; I&#8217;m going to have to slink along in your dust and hope you leave me something when you&#8217;re finished!</p>
<p>Dear Dorothy, I&#8217;m looking forward to writing about Lydia Davis &#8212; I started reading her at lunch today (while I was eating something other than a haibun, but that is my fault, entirely).  And what I especially love is that she is funny.</p>
<p>Dearest litlove, I know this isn&#8217;t really a response to your comment, but I love that word &#8220;risible&#8221;  &#8212; I&#8217;m going to see if I can work it into something, although maybe not a law something, because we&#8217;re not supposed to have a sense of humor there.  Still&#8230;.  As for twitter, well, every time I go over there to sign up I stop  myself &#8212; I&#8217;m still incorporating facebook into my life.  I think twitter will send me over the edge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

