‘Fess Up Friday

The literate kitten has proposed this terrific idea of a weekly confessional moment all over the blog world where people talk about what they’ve written (or not) the week before. Mine is up in the page called “writing” — a page I update a lot more often than this one, by the way, in case you’re wondering what on earth I’m doing. (I also update that other page, the one about submitting, every day or so too. It’s not for the faint of heart because it is a chronicle of pretty much unrelenting rejection.)

I’d like to say, though, that in addition to revising The Secret War, and thinking up some new stuff to write, I’ve also written a blog post that is complete except for some illustrative excerpts from the book I’m talking about. As soon as I FIND the book (it was just here somewhere….), I’ll post that.

Have a lovely weekend all of you.

Ten Poops Away From a Tech Deck

Heard around the BlogLily household this morning, father to son, “Dude, you’re ten poops away from a tech deck.”

Translation? Well, we’ve instituted a little reward for doing what you should be doing anyway program — the idea is if you walk Archie ten times (over a one week period, the week being written down on a little anal piece of paper with squares for eligible walks, a picture of which I might even post at some point), then you get something called a tech deck, which is a ridiculous remarkable toy that’s essentially a small skateboard that kids do tricks with, using their fingers. That ridiculous amazing toy is the object of much desire among 2/3 of the BlogLily children, the other being more interested in getting to go to Dark Carnival, our neighborhood bookstore, and buying a comic book.

So. In what can loosely be described as an inspiration, I decided to throw in the chance to get a walk credit for every five Archie poops picked up in the backyard. Don’t work too hard imagining our backyard, okay? Some are willing to scoop poop if it means they’ll get a tech deck. Others need to be reminded. That’s what their father was talking about this morning.

Which brings me, as usual, to something profound. Okay. Profound-ish.

Rewards are not a bad thing. I mean, really, there are just some jobs that don’t float one’s boat. And there’s nothing wrong with a little incentive to get you going.

I’d love to hear about reward programs in other households. In fact, if you leave a comment about a rewards program, I’ll SEND you a reward of some kind. I have a lot of stamps. And a lot of books/cool papers/pens/pencils/rulers/paper clips/paper objects. I promise not to send you a poop. I couldn’t, really, even if I was that much of a weirdo because they’ve all been pretty much scooped up.

Happy weekend all!

The Promised Profit Post: Measure for Measure

Oh, so long ago, I said I’d be writing about reading Shakespeare for profit, and then life intervened and I went off on a long jag of Elizabeth Taylor reading, and a lot of novel and story writing, and re-writing, and some other stuff, and well, really, it’s time to get back to Measure for Measure, for profit’s sake.

The word “profit” is one I love, just as I love the word “rich.” I have long felt compelled to point out to those who have to listen to me (aka my children) the non-monetary meanings of words like this. Think of it as a little bit of vocabulary subversiveness. “Rich” doesn’t mean rolling in cash; it means replete with something. It’s a good word, describing as it does the quantity of good things we should all have in our lives: we should be rich in laughter, in books, in words, in love. Same with profit. We profit from things not just monetarily, but morally and spiritually, intellectually and entertainment-wise.

Whenever I think of the word “profit” I think of Tennyson’s Ulysses, a poem so old-fashioned that it shows up in Ted Kennedy’s speeches. It begins: “it little profits that an idle king….” And, on the subject of random word association, I noticed this last week, as William was preparing for his First Communion, that when my kids think of profits they think of guys with long white beards who are messengers from an angry old testament god.

Okay, here comes the Shakespeare part. (Aren’t blogs great? They are one big digression. And nobody nails you for it!)

Sometimes, the thing you’re reading perfectly fits your current preoccupations. In the case of Measure for Measure, I found myself thinking that Shakespeare knew there is no better set up for a comedy with a slightly tragic edge than that of the righteous man who is himself doing the thing he so vigorously condemns.  And how that is SO Eliot Spitzer.

Shakespeare’s Spitzer is Angelo, who, moments after he is put in charge of the kingdom, gets right to work handing out death sentences for having sex without being married. And then, just moments later, he is busy trying to figure out how to seduce the play’s number one virgin who also happens to be a nun. You can tell that Angelo is in for a big fat fall.

How does it end up? It’s a C-O-M-E-D-Y, so after the proper amount of chastisement, everybody marries somebody and things are good.

It profits an idle writer like me to read Shakespeare not only because you realize that there are no unique plots, but also because once you are freed from the scariness of making stuff up, you can look around you and see how all you have to do is just steal what you need. And that’s what I did. I STOLE part of Measure for Measure for my new novel, for a subplot set in the Marks & Spencer food hall at Paddington Station. I even have a nun character. She’s Swedish. She looks severe. She’s a traffic expert. She knows a lot about snow. I think that’s very nun-like, to be an expert at things having to do with winter. The Marks & Spencer manager is a righteous guy. And that’s all I needed to get going. Thank you, Will.

It Was Like, You Know

Today, I bring to you my thoughts on how and whether to use metaphor and simile. That got you running for the advil, didn’t it?

The reason this is today’s topic is because I read recently on the website of a literary agent something about how you shouldn’t use more than two similes/metaphors in an entire work of fiction. Now THAT made me sit up straighter. For one thing, I can never remember the difference between the two. In my defense, I’d just like to point out that it doesn’t really matter if you know the name of the thing you’re doing with words as long as you do it well. For another thing, I don’t use very many similes/metaphors because I can never think of any. When I do think of one, I read it over and over and feel enormous satisfaction at my achievement. In fact, just recently, I began a short story with a simile. I mean, a metaphor. No, a simile.

Here it is, for your amusement and edification. And don’t worry, after we skim over my fiction, we’ll be on to Homer — so keep reading because it gets better. And more ancient and classical.

Here’s me, from a story called The Centerfold Club:

What surprised Emily the most, even more than discovering that she didn’t in the least mind seeing Mark, her husband of twenty years, with his arms around the girl, was how bumpy the girl’s skin felt. Specifically, the skin on her legs, which is where she told Emily to put her hands, after she finished grinding herself into Mark’s lap, and turning around and around, in one suggestive pose after another, like a rotisserie chicken, all heated, bronzed, exposed skin, rotating around them both, for as long as the green light stayed on.

That, dear readers is a simile, I’m pretty sure, because it uses the word “like.” I am also confident that, in the entire history of western literature nobody — and I do mean nobody — has thought to compare an exotic dancer to a rotisserie chicken. Now THAT was a good day’s work.

On to Homer. Homer loved, loved, loved similes. (Take that, literary agent.) They have a life of their own, really, in the Iliad — sometimes, you forget the Argives or the Achaeans or the Trojans (who had other names too, and please don’t get me started on why it is that he couldn’t just stick to “Trojans” and “Greeks”) were even in a big battle because all of sudden they’re bees, or leaves, or cows or something. Here’s a good one:

From the camp
The troops were turning out now, thick as bees
that issue from some crevice in a rock face,
endlessly pouring forth, to make a cluster
and swarm on blooms of summer here and there,
glinting and droning, busy in bright air.
Like bees innumerable from ships and huts
down the deep foreshore streamed those regiments
toward the assembly ground-

Simile! So famous, in fact, that others (Virgil I think) borrowed it and used it again.

There are a million of these things in the Iliad. In fact, there’s an entire web site devoted to them. So, my response to the only-two-similes-per-novel is: bah. I love them (if I could only think of them), Homer, obviously, never met a simile he didn’t like, and Shakespeare clearly knew his way around a metaphor (all the world’s a stage, baby).

Why did they use them? Because simile and metaphor deepen our understanding of what a writer is trying to say, I think. My own modest simile is intended to draw the reader’s attention to the fact that an exotic dancer, the ultimate “chick(en)” is a commodity, an object on display, and something sort of delicious, although not really, because, if uncooked, there’s all that bumpy flesh and, when cooked and displayed, maybe a little too perfect looking. Okay, okay. I totally made that up. The truth is that my own modest simile is in that story because it cracked me up and I happen to like the word “chicken.” (One of William’s favorite jokes is “Why did the baby cross the road? Because he was stapled to the chicken.” This joke is a family favorite because it (a) involves the word chicken and (b) the word staple.)

Really, I think writers use simile and metaphor because thinking up a good simile/metaphor is just plain fun. Wit, as I recall, has to do with combining dissimilar things, in a way that gives the reader (and the writer) pleasure. (That’s probably why I love Donne so much — that flea love thing really gets me, although I know it’s not everyone’s cup o’tea.) So, if you can think of a good metaphor or simile, I say: have at it.

And now I’m off, like a … bad simile!

I’d also like to add that I wrote this post lightening fast (metaphor!), did not check my spelling of things like Argives and Achaean (is it possible that word has THAT many vowels in it?) and apologize in advance if that literary agent — whose name and site I cannot now recall — said three was okay, rather than two. And, finally, I think I might be incapable of short & sweet blog posts because it actually takes more time to write something witty and short — like a simile or metaphor — than it does to write a loooooong post yammering on about simile and metaphor.

A Tulip (or two) For You

Just like that, a whole week’s gone.   The waiting for rejections and the writing part of it is recorded here and here.  I wish I could say I’ve read, but I haven’t.  I’ve just noticed how beautiful it is when spring returns to the bay area.   Sometimes I wonder if I’ve stopped being a reader.  It’s so odd to think that might be the case, having read so much and for so long.

Where Oh Where is that Podcast?

Dear Faithful Readers,  Your many wonderful questions have provided us with many an evening mulling over issues we seldom think about.  Why does time go so fast when you’re having fun, what goes into a real martini — those and other questions have precluded a speedy podcast.

Okay, okay.  We actually do know what goes into a real martini.  And yes, we have an answer for the time question too.  You know why I haven’t been here for two whole weeks? 

My computer crashed.  Yargh.  That’s never actually happened to me before — the thing where your screen goes blank, and then weird vertical lines begin to wave across the screen and the fan comes on and makes a huge amount of noise, like something’s going to blow up.  Nothing did actually blow up, but I’ve had to relinquish my access to all of you, and to my neat podcasting microphone thingy, for a while.  I try not to blog at work, but this morning I realized I needed to at least say something!

So, wish me luck on the repairs — I figure it’ll be a week. 

Love, BL

Why Can’t a Woman Be More Like a Man?

posterThere are a lot of things you can use to draw lines that separate one type of person from another. Red states/blue states. Coke/Pepsi. Fried/Grilled. San Francisco Giants/Oakland A’s.

But my personal favorite line is this one: loves musicals/hates musicals. I’m in the former camp. My brothers? Latter camp. It’s a pretty good line, the kind that can neatly bisect a family.  (I’d like to add here,  for the purposes of strict historical accuracy, that those throwing up noises in the background, the ones I tried to ignore while I was concentrating on The King and I?  They were NOT my brother Ed, who loves musicals.  They were a different brother, who has not yet come forward to claim responsibility or deny involvement.) 

My own children have inherited whatever gene produces the love of musicals. Especially the youngest, who is as fond of musicals as I am and often chooses, as a conversation starter, the following type of question: “which do you like more: Mary Poppins or The Sound of Music”? You might be surprised to learn (depending on which side of the line you’re on), that this topic can take a very long time — a lifetime really — to answer satisfactorily.

But until today, when I tried to answer a series of questions posed by Mandarine about gender differences, I hadn’t realized just how handy musicals can be in sorting out tricky feminist issues. Say you want to address the interesting subject of how and why women and men differ from each other. Well, here’s your answer, both to the how and why, and it comes straight from Messrs. Lerner and Loewe.

As you’ll see, one part of the answer is that women are different from men because women haven’t yet figured out how to be more like men. I mean, more like Rex Harrison. You know, ‘enry ‘iggins.

So, here’s what Henry Higgins has to say on this subject. It helps if you sort of sing it softly to yourself. (You can find it on itunes if you’ve never heard it.) And don’t say I’m not doing anything to improve your education:

“Why Can’t a Woman Be More Like a Man?”
music by Frederick Loewe; lyrics by Alan Jay Lerner
PROFESSOR HIGGINS:
Why can’t a woman be more like a man?
Men are so honest, so thoroughly square;
Eternally noble, historically fair.
Who, when you win, will always give your back a pat.
Why can’t a woman be like that?

Why does every one do what the others do?
Can’t a woman learn to use her head?
Why do they do everything their mothers do?
Why don’t they grow up, well, like their father instead?

Why can’t a woman take after a man?
Men are so pleasant, so easy to please.
Whenever you’re with them, you’re always at ease.

Would you be slighted if I didn’t speak for hours?

COLONEL PICKERING:
Of course not.

PROFESSOR HIGGINS:
Would you be livid if I had a drink or two?

COLONEL PICKERING:
Nonsense.

PROFESSOR HIGGINS:
Would you be wounded if I never sent you flowers?

COLONEL PICKERING:
Never.

PROFESSOR HIGGINS:
Well, why can’t a woman be like you?

One man in a million may shout a bit.
Now and then, there’s one with slight defects.
One perhaps whose truthfulness you doubt a bit,
But by and large we are a marvelous sex!

Why can’t a woman take after a man?
‘Cause men are so friendly, good-natured and kind.
A better companion you never will find.

If I were hours late for dinner would you bellow?

COLONEL PICKERING:
Of course not.

PROFESSOR HIGGINS:
If I forgot your silly birthday, would you fuss?

COLONEL PICKERING:
Nonsense.

PROFESSOR HIGGINS:
Would you complain if I took out another fellow?

Pickering
Never.

PROFESSOR HIGGINS:
Why can’t a woman be like us?

[dialog]

PROFESSOR HIGGINS:
Why can’t a woman be more like a man?
Men are so decent, such regular chaps;
Ready to help you through any mishaps;
Ready to buck you up whenever you’re glum.
Why can’t a woman be a chum?

Why is thinking something women never do?
And why is logic never even tried?
Straightening up their hair is all they ever do.
Why don’t they straighten up the mess that’s inside?

Why can’t a woman behave like a man?
If I was a woman who’d been to a ball,
Been hailed as a princess by one and by all;
Would I start weeping like a bathtub overflowing,
Or carry on as if my home were in a tree?
Would I run off and never tell me where I’m going?
Why can’t a woman be like me?

And that, Dear Reader, is all I have to say tonight.

Saturday Evening Blogroll

I didn’t get around to posting over at Best Blog until tonight, so Saturday Morning Blogroll morphed into Saturday Evening Blogroll — in California, that is. Everywhere else, it’s Sunday Morning Blogroll.

I saw a lot of knitting blogs in my blogcruising today. I liked them. Knitters are a literate bunch. Later this week, I’ll write about them.

Speaking of knitting blogs, here’s a very funny piece by Secret Mojo Dumbs it Down For You. It’s called Knit-Fu, a Sock Wearer’s Perspective. It’s funny and so is Mr. Mojo.

The Picture Pretty Much Says It

for today. All’s well.  (Note added several months later:  I’ve deleted that picture, having decided it’s not really so great for my children to have even distant pictures of them, given how long stuff like that lives on the internet).  Surgery’s over and all’s well.  Now, I’m going back to sleep!

So, What Did the Italian Guy SAY to Zidane?

Zidane. You saw him headbutt that Italian guy when there were only a few minutes left in overtime against Italy. You saw the Italian guy go down like … well, like he probably deserved to. You saw the red card and France’s chances of winning go south.

And if you weren’t too busy screamining invective at the television, you might have seen what led up to the headbutt — the Italian guy kind of got in Zidane’s way, put his arm around his waist when the play was over, and leaned in and said something. A pause. And then the spectacular headbutt.

So, what did the Italian guy say?

My favorite of all possibilities is the one proffered by our friend Kate:

Dude, those shorts make your butt look really big.

Every woman agreed that would merit the game losing headbutt.

Anybody read lips and know if he said something even worse than that? Is it even possible?

Saturday Morning Blogroll

can now be found at BestBlog

This week’s serendipitous gifts, in case you’re wondering, are: deskbound
and distraction no. 99. I just went back and spent some more time paging through distraction no. 99′s site — she’s a really fine writer! And if you have a chance, check out quirk’s latest post on Cascadia, and the no shower girls’ flurry of food posting and, well, everyone else on the Saturday morning blogroll to the right.